Employees with a safe social security fund are more efficient. High unemployment insurance levels should make the system of widespread fixed-term employment and temp work more efficient.
Employees with a secure social security fund are more efficient. For many years, like most of the Western world, we have had equilibrium unemployment to keep inflation down. The purpose of an equilibrium unemployment rate is incorrectly thought. Inflation is not necessarily the enemy of the working people. Inflation mostly eats up loans. Inflation also occurs at production difficulties. Inflation does not normally occur when the incomes of the common people correspond to production needs. Milton Friedman tricked us into thinking that the common people's money must be strong understep the production need.
Safe employees are more efficient
We do not have a full employment policy via one big enough public sector and large public investments in technology development. Then we have to make the system of temporary employment work as smoothly as possible. Many high-performing employees can be fired up by the threat of leaving at the end of the induction period. Research on people's brains shows when we are at our most problem-solving and creative. It is when we are rested, relaxed, equal, reasonably free and playful. We want to preserve the health of the fixed-term employee so that he can continue to work and look for work. We value that the interaction between the employee and the employer should be as efficient as possible. Then we should have a high social security fund for which it is easy to qualify. Employees with a safe social security fund are more efficient.
The right claims since the 1800s wrongly that a high unemployment insurance creates unemployment. During the recession in the 1800th century, when people were starving, the right did not even then want to help the needy for fear that they would then not look for work.
A high social security fund improves employment and competitiveness
studies on social security and unemployment shows that high social security levels lead to better jobs. The plant height will be higher, competitiveness greater, employment higher in the country and wages will be strengthened. High social insurance levels also mean that recessions are not as severe. Employees with a safe social security fund are more efficient.
Safe conditions for temporary workers improve efficiency. It follows from this that involuntary absence from work such as in the case of unemployment, sick leave or disability pension on a full or part-time basis should not lower upcoming retirement pensions. We have created a society with equilibrium unemployment and recurring financial crashes and recessions. Here, it is quite impossible for the vast majority of people to be employed full-time throughout their working life, no matter how hard they try. Therefore, involuntary absence from work should also provide an old-age pension comparable to at least the wages of middle-income earners.
We can afford welfare. Poor conditions for ordinary people get the inequality to shine with reduced productivity and mental illness resulting. When the state creates money, it leads to a reduction in the need for private indebtedness. Instead, there is money for jobs, welfare and technology development.