Citizens suspended talks on how to speed up housing construction again because the red-greens protected the interests of the people and refused to agree to market rents. Market rents that not many people could afford would lead to a chain of migration from better housing to worse housing, where those who lived in the worst housing would become homeless. In addition, it would reduce general purchasing power so people would not be able to afford to sustain the consumption necessary for employment.
Then M returned with the argument that the total contributions must not exceed 75% of the minimum wage in the country in order to motivate people to work. Most Swedes are ready to take tough jobs, but do not want jobs that are directly harmful to their health or jobs with a deliberately poor working environment. These are the kind of jobs only that M's policy would motivate people to take.
Thirdly, there are no minimum wages in Sweden. The minimum wage is actually zero kroner/hi in Sweden.
M refers that it would be according to the Swedish model that it should not pay too much to work. A certain loss of income can be counted as sick or unemployed. But in Sweden, when we built the Swedish model, we chose not to have the same unemployment insurance level or sickness benefit for everyone, but that this should be based on what you earned before your involuntary absence from work. It does no one any good if graduates have to be starved to apply for sausage bread packaging jobs. What jobs should those with lower education take and what will the conditions be like for the jobs that graduates are starved to apply for when the employer's supply of desperate job seekers increases?
In addition, the citizens' idea of a large boundary between the highest contribution and the lowest wages in the country does not work. It is natural that the lowest wages are pressured to follow the highest contribution. When minimum public benefits are reduced, jobseekers become more desperate and employers do not have to worry about maintaining healthy conditions and livable wages on the job. So what the citizens want is actually a general wage cut for those who work. This would lower the general purchasing power needed to sustain employment and create new jobs.