As said, S wants to offer jobseekers more educational opportunities. It is good so that the jobseekers can become qualified to get the jobs that are available.
But it should not be compatible with a red ideology to exclude the person from the unemployment fund who does what he can to look for a job. In addition, both S and M want an equilibrium unemployment rate of 5% to keep inflation down. Then you have to take into account that some may be more unlucky than others and find it more difficult to find a new job. The disabled are over-represented in Phase 3. Employers do not want immigrants with poor Swedish, stress-sensitive, human rights defenders or others who are not fully adapted and high-performing in their workplaces.
In addition, it is usually a recession now and even in booms, employers do not hire very many people.
The situation does not allow, and neither should the red ideology, the insurance of jobseekers after a certain time.
The best way to create full employment is to expand the number of public employees. The private sector has been given the chance since 1991 to try to create enough jobs and has failed. In addition, if the public sector is expanded, this stimulates demand, especially in recessions, and can reduce overload sick leave in the public sector. In addition, we can share the work.