How many burn the furniture to heat the house or burn the growth capital?
How can it be rational to sell off assets that give a 10 percent return to reduce a debt with an interest rate of between 2 and 6 percent. This is very difficult to understand.
Borg sells off businesses that provide the state with large but short-term revenues to reduce the national debt while cutting welfare. You can compare it to the logic of burning up the furniture to heat the house. The alliance does not score forwards, but opens up goals from behind. Not only that, but it scores own goals and celebrates.
With all clarity, Borg promotes one-sidedness the short-term fiscal policy during the EU's cheering for Europe's new order, which is called a Swedish tiger economy - the predator's economy. Is it folly, blindness or deliberate destruction? All concepts are turned on their head.
Sweden has undergone a number of deregulations since the 80s through a liberal fiscal policy. Thus began a privatization of society.
The alliance is now planning a government sale of Telia with the entire telephone network. If this happens, then the Alliance has sold Sweden out to a foreign power. The alliance exposes Sweden to an enormous security risk. It is then a case of national treason against the Swedish people and being their benefactor. Community ownership must be national for a future free society. The plans are simply worthy.
Earth's and humanity's worst example of private ownership is the financial fraud and the private central banks Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve Federal Reserve Banks. Today we also see the consequences of a Swedish "marketization" or privatization:
- the deregulation of the credit market in 1985 and the financial crash in 1992
- the train market, the train chaos, the split of SJ, the wine conflicts and the national brake for a sustainable development in communication
- the post office and the depopulation of the countryside
- the electricity market with the worst, most short-term and most expensive development
Then there is the dismantling of the defense to an international mercenary army. Everything that has a national basis is now being loosened, with the EU emerging as a superior non-democratic body.
At the turn of the year, the Swedish national debt was 35 percent of GDP. The EU's stability pact sets its limit at 60. Italy has over 100. When the government recently sold off shares in Nordea, it was still with the argument that we have to amortize even more.
Yes, we need to amortize, but should we throw away the future for the sake of it? Everyone knows the IMF's corrupt austerity policy.
We have been indebted on an unprecedented scale through the financial world's worst fraud of all time with worthless securities, currency speculation and mass production of dollars without a firm foundation, ie production of paper money to borrowers that diminishes in purchase value. The "milk" is spread out until it is drained of all nutrition and productive power in society. Bonds are also promissory notes. Until 1971, the gold standard applied. The US had a huge gold reserve that disappeared with the Vietnam War.
Sweden's liberals let lending flow in 1985.The rest is history but still echoes in politics, economics and through all the cuts. The people are held responsible for what the financial world has done. Republican states in the US want to remove collective bargaining agreements for public employees for wage cuts and layoffs.
"There is no country in the world that has had problems with a government debt that is too small," says Borg in his defense. But Borg saves in such a way that the "tree" dries and branches that bear fruit are sawn off for the future. The mechanistic economy turns society into a system, where the value in people excludes man as the cause and goal of society's development and future. All ethics disappear with monetary thinking. Large corporations are allowed to control the macro economy. Borg and the Alliance create a suffocating economy that also suffocates business.
Shouldn't it be time to invest in the future? asked even Cecilia Hermansson, chief economist at Swedbank. Upapparently the same thought has struck the infrastructure minister. Railways that do not collapse from lack of maintenance undeniably favor long-term growth.
Governments tend to almost always overestimate what they can achieve in the short term and underestimate what they can achieve in the long term. However, this government seems to have completely lost the perspective of the future.
Whatever Borg says: how can it be rational to sell off assets that yield 10 percent to reduce a debt with an interest rate of between 2 and 6 percent? This is difficult to understand.
A paradoxical development is underway not to say a downright insane and harmful disarmament. Selling assets is like setting fire to the walls and furniture to get heat in the house. Deregulation of the credit market, the post office, train traffic, housing and electricity shows decline and decay.
A strong infrastructure and development of competence is the tree that must grow. A plan household is therefore necessary. Neoliberal economics and market economics produce nothing new.
Borg, your financial management builds short-termism and handing Sweden over to private hands. The history of the right shows nothing but that it consumes and profits from land and people. Freedom has never come from you but from the depths of the people. The alliance and the EU say one thing but mean another.