When Aktuell deals with the EU, it is as if there is always a big surprise from what is happening. Events are presented completely cluelessly. The project has been running for 65 years without deeper analyses.
How it happened and which organs were involved has never been disclosed. Not crazy about the European Pact. No questions.
Watching and listening to the news on SVT is one of the most indulgent and flat things imaginable. It seems that journalism is disappearing.
Hearing the newsreaders present news with these practiced tones and polished facades no matter what happens here and in the world. If they are the EU crisis or a book fair, it will be about the same. These readers could just as easily be replaced by digitized costume dolls.
The whole studio resembles a glittering disco hall. It is so tiresome with this theater every night and hearing this triumphant signature flow out into the ether.
Not an iota of personality. Everything must be neutral and completely lifeless. A total sterilization. Objectivity to death. But that is not objectivity.
Everything is selected and then it is subjective. Either these mediators are completely ignorant of what is happening and happening around us or they want to keep the Swedish people ignorant.
It is as if every piece of news in society would be a total surprise for SVT. This awareness of time extends to the day-fresh, as if it were freshly baked bread.
If it is more than six months, then this already belongs to ancient times. The editor's analyzes will only be a repetition of what the "elite" and decision makers think.
Everything that happens comes out of one and the same process. Since the 70s, a liberalization has swept over Sweden that is never questioned.
The social reports that are available are available late on Sunday evenings and, possibly, replays on the knowledge channel. But if you don't do research yourself, you wouldn't know anything.
How has e.g. European Pact processed? All democracy is being swept away. What ideology is behind the EU? Has SVT raised that issue? If no, why is this not done? No knowledge? No will? May not?
No, they can't because they don't know what a society is and what happened during these 65 years with the EC/EU elite. The omission is huge.
Who designed the EU? The people, democrats or big business? The European Round Table of Industrialists during the 80s are the designers behind the EU.
The big business lobby groups, led by the Roundtable group, have greatly contributed to the neoliberal restructuring that has taken place in the EU since the internal market project was put into effect. A tailor-made solution. Not a word is mentioned in this on SVT.
The BBC and other English media dare to criticize. There are materials and articles that you have not shown.
Another example of SVT's flatness is the recent debate in Aktuellt between Housing Minister Stefan Attefall and Veronica Palm about housing queues. What do you think? Yes, and what do you say about this? Yes. Thank you so much for coming here to Aktuelltstudion!
Damn, what miserable news reporting and analysis we have with SVT. One might wonder what guides all the other programs' view of humans.
Another example of SVT's flatness is the recent debate in Aktuellt between Housing Minister Stefan Attefall and Veronica Palm about housing queues. What do you think? Yes, and what do you say about this? Yes. Thank you so much for coming here to Aktuelltstudion!
That the CIA also operated in Sweden last year took its time. TV4 was out the same evening about the whole thing.
On Wednesday 8 June 2011, Statistics Norway's major voter sympathy survey was published and the Social Democrats came out as the big winner.
"We and the newspapers are criticizing Juholt now and at the same time these numbers are coming... Why then?"
SVT Aktuell's presenter Anna Hedenmo looked genuinely upset when she asked political scientist Jenny Madestam the question on Wednesday. Yes, that is indeed a strange comment.
How far has the neoliberal propaganda reached SVT as a free and impartial television? How is this set on SVT and with the democratic defence?