1 responses to “The financial crisis should be exploited by the left"
Hello!
I agree that the left opposition is too passive and lame. The Swedish people hope that the V block will restore the Swedish model. It is a path that serves people and society's development. The S policy is blurry and empty.
Maynard Keynes's economic model for a mixed economy in the 30s was successful.
The reform policy of the Social Democrats and Sweden was based on this and applied until 1982. Then the strange thing happened in Swedish politics. A complete reversal takes place. The Social Democrats had won the election in 1982. Then things happened that ran counter to everything that was going on.
Sweden's welfare society breaks down 1982 – 1992. Devaluation, new credit restrictions, currency and real estate speculation broke the Swedish economy. The then Finance Minister Feldt spoke about the third way. Sweden's economic bled at the same time as there were savings and rationalizations in society.
At the same time, Swedish foreign policy is drowned by the incident in Horsfjärden in the fall of 1982. Carl Bildt is at the forefront.
At the same time, business and Volvo preach about short-termism for managers and employees. A logic that stunned and closed many possibilities. Environmental concepts for cars came and went. Bi-Fuel was developed at the beginning of the 90s and Volvo was well ahead. Everything is very strange.
The third way destroyed over a long period of time a built-up social capital and caused a costly inefficiency. It spread ill health through exhausted and sick people in the community.
I believe that Swedish politics in 1982 was an obstacle to the EU's market-friendly economy and the envisaged EU state. The third way concerns this. Sovereign nations like Sweden blocked the EU and the peoples of Europe did not welcome the EU.
The Social Democrats seem to have abandoned their core values in favor of the EU.
Hello!
I agree that the left opposition is too passive and lame. The Swedish people hope that the V block will restore the Swedish model. It is a path that serves people and society's development. The S policy is blurry and empty.
Maynard Keynes's economic model for a mixed economy in the 30s was successful.
The reform policy of the Social Democrats and Sweden was based on this and applied until 1982. Then the strange thing happened in Swedish politics. A complete reversal takes place. The Social Democrats had won the election in 1982. Then things happened that ran counter to everything that was going on.
Sweden's welfare society breaks down 1982 – 1992. Devaluation, new credit restrictions, currency and real estate speculation broke the Swedish economy. The then Finance Minister Feldt spoke about the third way. Sweden's economic bled at the same time as there were savings and rationalizations in society.
At the same time, Swedish foreign policy is drowned by the incident in Horsfjärden in the fall of 1982. Carl Bildt is at the forefront.
At the same time, business and Volvo preach about short-termism for managers and employees. A logic that stunned and closed many possibilities. Environmental concepts for cars came and went. Bi-Fuel was developed at the beginning of the 90s and Volvo was well ahead. Everything is very strange.
The third way destroyed over a long period of time a built-up social capital and caused a costly inefficiency. It spread ill health through exhausted and sick people in the community.
I believe that Swedish politics in 1982 was an obstacle to the EU's market-friendly economy and the envisaged EU state. The third way concerns this. Sovereign nations like Sweden blocked the EU and the peoples of Europe did not welcome the EU.
The Social Democrats seem to have abandoned their core values in favor of the EU.