The right-wing parties usually make fun of the red-greens because they put other people's interests before their own. However, most of the right is poor, but instead of asking for higher wages, secure employment conditions and good social insurance and benefits etc, they prioritize favoring the big capitalists' dinner tables in the hope that enough will fall from the tables of the overfed so that the poor themselves should be satisfied. Is this not a belief that altruism/almost love with the rich should benefit oneself? It would be better if the poor looked after their own long-term financial interests. At the beginning of the 1900th century, Sweden was very right-wing, economically and technologically backward. At the end of the 1900th century, thanks to a social democratic third way, we were one of the world's richest and most technologically developed countries. Since the right-wing took over in 2006, the professions of the poor have spread widely and growth has stalled. The right leads to economic insecurity and vulnerability for most. Welfare drives labour-saving machines, which benefits both ordinary people and the rich. Many large companies lobby to make it more difficult to develop democracy, welfare and environmental protection. Instead, big companies are trying to regain their ability to manufacture pesticides that can exterminate bees. Without the bees we would all die within 4 years. Instead, we all need to take the environment into account and discover a new environmentally friendly energy source. Wall Street institutes and economic gurus warn that continued rising economic inequality threatens growth and increases social unrest somewhat enormously. There will be fewer profits if the poor cannot afford to shop. Environmentally friendly and healthy economic development is best achieved with a red-green blowtorch on large companies.
Left blog
