The bourgeois government violated fundamental legal principles when it retroactively lowered the high school grades of 70-year-olds and older students by introducing extra merit points for younger students.
In Sweden and according to international principles of the rule of law, you should never be able to be prosecuted or sentenced for a crime that was not legally prohibited when it was committed. This is so that people cannot be sentenced completely irrationally at the whim of the authorities. A legal system must be predictable. One can only be expected to do one's best in accordance with the laws that currently prevail.
In some exceptional cases, it is lucky that people are sentenced anyway, as in the case of the Nuremberg trials.
By analogy with the fact that it cannot be considered a crime against which there is no law, you should not be able to demand by law that the students in the 70s and earlier would have adapted to a merit point system that did not exist then. Yet the bourgeois coalition government has requested just this.
Apparently, the Alliance considered it very disgusting that 70-somethings and previous generations could apply to university on equal terms with 90-somethings. In any case, the principle of no crime without law departed. iom the introduction of merit points, which in practice lowered 70's grades decades later. I don't know exactly from when, but those with older grades e.g. those born in 1975 and earlier do not receive extra merit points for having studied the correct course.
So someone, who had the highest grades in everything and was born in 1975, can now lose a study place to someone who was born later with worse grades but who studied the right course and thus received extra merit points.
Sweden needs a constitutional court. Not an almost powerless constitutional committee.