Market rents lead to consumption so low that it threatens jobs and businesses. In addition, it leads to mass homelessness and unhealthy overcrowding.
Even red-green experts are sometimes blinded by the values in their area of expertise. The Social Democratic Economist Club at the School of Economics claims in DN Debatt that freer rental rates are needed to counteract segregation and housing shortages.
The problems with the economics students' arguments are any number. There are not enough rich people in the low-income areas to take over market rental apartments in the rich areas. In contrast, market rents would empty wealthy areas of ordinary people. Ordinary people would move to the low-income areas and the poorest in the low-income areas would not be able to afford to live anywhere.
F. island consumption would decrease significantly in the country, when people's income to an extremely high degree would only go to rent. F. island rent regulation is largely abolished but we have not introduced market rents yet.
We should use the pension funds to build a new but more aesthetic millionaire program with rental properties at low-income-friendly rents. It would give the state stable income and, among other things, make people able to move away from their parents or their ex, not live unhealthily crowded, be able to afford to keep employment up with their consumption and move to where the jobs are.