According to an investigation proposal. SEK 3,3 billion is to be saved on support and assistance for the disabled and by introducing an age limit.
This brutalizes Swedish society. The investigation proposal breathes the new Swedish merciless view that the Alliance pursues in its government policy.
Do the liberals of the new politics not realize the vicious circle? They make people desperate. They violate people's dignity. creates injustice and aggressiveness in society. They create higher costs in ill health and violence. These are the social consequences of the unjust economy.
The governing parties participate in this destructive and ineffective development and then fight it with a rationalized care and police activity.
The government is once again targeting the vulnerable in society who need all the help they can get. The situation is already very difficult for many disabled people.
This is not a step in the development of society. A society's existence is based on the fact that it is a human community for and with each other.
The Alliance's politics are breaking and dismantling this. The societies of the world are becoming increasingly hostile to people and life on earth.
The billion savings on LSS is such a hostile act and is also directly aimed at a very vulnerable group as well as at Sweden as a future society.
This policy belongs to the liberals' fraud against Sweden.
I agree with this. There is a trend.
For a long time, the idea of a public home lived in Sweden, where society was just a community. In the previous reform policy, there was a balance between society's social sector and business life as a provider for the nation. Almost every political and economic step that has been taken in the world since the 70s and also in Sweden, since the financial crash of 1992, has led to resources being transferred from the middle class to the upper class, from the public sector to the private sector and from poor countries to the rich the countries. The latter has been true for centuries.
Poland and South Africa were countries that wanted to break free. The price they had to pay was that the important national assets such as banks, mines, shipyards or companies ended up in the control of foreign private hands. Without a national economy of its own, there was no way to sovereignty, liberation or redistribution of resources for the good of the people. China has now replaced the planned economy with a market economy. An elite has emerged with the poor at the bottom. Politically, China is still a communist regime.
Capitalism has now taken on a new face with both extremes in it. The alliance called itself the new labor party in the 2006 election. This shows the ambivalence of liberalism.
The history of politics also turns out to be connected with the history and destruction of industrialism.