In human rights, it says that each of us has the right to a job. That's good. We have the right to gainful employment to earn a living. This should also include that the workplace must adapt to the employee and not the other way around. Even the weak must have the right to support themselves.
However, the situation has changed. Automation means that less and less is needed in production. Then we could create pretend jobs for people. But wouldn't it be better to extend the right to work to the right to livelihood so that people could reap the benefits of automation?
Those who want a job should still be able to get one. But those who could imagine a lower level of compensation could become flâneurs. (An unconditional compensation floor also leads to higher wages for those who work. Read more here!) It may sound irresponsible, but should anyone who doesn't dare take a really hard job really have to die for this? This allowance would be so low that it stimulated job-seeking or study, but so high that the relatively well-off risked falling through the safety nets. And those who could imagine a compensation between the flaneur's low compensation and the worker's high compensation could be allowed to study. We should really use the opportunities of the affluent society to favor the opportunities for knowledge acquisition throughout life. Apart from all the humanitarian benefits of this, it increases our society's competitive advantage.
Then one should create as many jobs as are needed so that the production and the work in health care, school and care will have a human burden. In addition, the profits from automation should be used to greatly expand the cultural sector so that more people could get meaningful jobs where the things and services they created were used to create pleasure, meaning, an equal and tolerant society, general education and critical reflections.