The large flows of refugees do not really change the reforms that still needed and still need to be made in Sweden. First, we need to restore the tax rate to 2006 levels. As far as I remember, people were in no worse distress then than now. Quite the opposite in many cases. Just after the election, the newspapers in Sweden published the news that Sweden had the third strongest global competitiveness in the world that year.
With this increased tax revenue, we would be able to build out public sector to eliminate unemployment. Large parts of the public sector, especially schools, health care, culture and the railways, are abnormally understaffed and understaffed today. According to a calculation by the Riksdag's economists from 2006, eliminating unemployment by expanding the public sector would not cost more than the costs of equilibrium unemployment do today. Then presumably stress-related medical expenses would decrease when fewer people fell ill due to understaffing in the public sector.
When more people have jobs, these can consume the companies' products and services, which would stimulate the economy. We would also need to use the restored tax rate to build cheap, good and beautiful rental housing for renters of all different family sizes. This would mean that more people could move to where the jobs were and that we could offer housing for everyone.
The capital benefits from low and middle income earners. All power has always been based on social acceptance. Social acceptance is gained by serving as many people as possible.