Research points to five sure ways to influence health and extend life
Living long and feeling well until the end is possible, according to research from Olle Melander, professor of internal medicine at Skåne University Hospital. The research, which also includes Melander himself as a "test animal", provides insights into how one can influence one's biological aging and prevent age-related diseases.
Genes play a role, but can be influenced by lifestyle
The genes are a decisive factor, but according to Melander, it is possible to influence their effect through lifestyle changes. The research identifies different gene variants that increase the risk of disease and early aging. Melander emphasizes that while genes make up about 50 percent of our health, we can influence the rest through our lifestyle and environment.
Five surefire ways to extend life and promote health:
- Eat only almost full: Eating slowly and stopping when you are about 80 percent full reduces disease-causing processes and can prolong life.
- Quit smoking: Smoking shortens life by up to five years, according to research.
- Let your "bad genes" cheer you up: Lifestyle changes have a greater payoff if you have a genetic predisposition. It is important to understand that it is not done just because you have unfavorable genes.
- Be active: Regular physical activity, such as 30 minutes of brisk walking each day, can add three extra years.
- Fill life with meaning: Having a sense of meaning in life is as important as exercise. Social factors, such as spending time with friends and family, as well as involvement in interesting activities, have a positive effect on health.
Social aspects and cognitive stimulation important for aging
The research highlights that social aspects, such as spending time with friends and family, laughter, and intellectual stimulation through study, play as important a role as exercise in healthy ageing. Finding meaning in life is a central part of well-being. Healthy, religious contexts with an emphasis on tolerance, equality and solidarity are very constructive.
Aging starts at 30, but it's never too late to start thinking about your health
Although aging starts at 30, the research emphasizes that it is never too late to positively influence health. Lifestyle changes can be of great benefit even after you have had, for example, a heart attack. However, Melander emphasizes the importance that the earlier you take hold of your lifestyle, the greater benefit you do for the health of the population.
Unclear connections between weight and aging
The study also touches on the connection between weight and aging. It is established that a certain excess weight is not as dangerous as previously thought, and obese people sometimes live longer than normal weight people. However, Melander emphasizes that the most important thing is to counteract unfavorable genes through early and continuous lifestyle changes.
Eating a varied diet, including foods such as milk, cheese, broccoli, kale, nuts, and fatty fish, as well as regular exposure to the sun, contributes to stronger bones. Physical activity and a healthy lifestyle are fundamental to promoting long-term brain and body health.
The study from Lund University points out that women who experience menopause early, between the ages of 40 and 45, as well as those who losing weight after 50, are at increased risk of fractures. It underscores the importance of paying attention to these factors and taking preventive measures to preserve bone health.
Association between economic inequality and health outcomes
The book "The spirit of equality” by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett highlights the link between economic inequality and community health. According to the authors, a more equal society usually leads to overall improvements, both for the well-being of individuals and for the functioning of society.
Wilkinson and Pickett argue that a high degree of economic equality creates better conditions for a healthier society. In line with this, their work emphasizes the importance of reducing the gaps between different social classes and promoting a more equal distribution of resources.
According to the "Spirit of Equality", there are strong links between economic inequality and a range of health outcomes, including increased incidence of mental health problems, substance abuse, and low life expectancy. They emphasize that these consequences do not only affect the most disadvantaged, but also those in the higher social classes.
Through international comparisons and extensive evidence, the book supports the thesis that more equal societies tend to be better on many levels, not only in terms of health but also social relations and societal stability. Wilkinson and Pickett argue that there is an "egalitarian spirit" that permeates our society and that should be taken seriously to create sustainable and healthy societies.
Conclusion: Active aging through small, but effective changes
Through small, but effective changes in diet, lifestyle and environment, you can influence your biological aging and promote long-term health. Conscious eating, avoiding smoking, being physically active, seeking social connections and stimulating the brain are key factors for active and meaningful aging. The research from Lund University provides concrete advice for a healthy and sustainable lifestyle, regardless of age. All this becomes easier to achieve in more equal societies.
Perhaps capitalism's ideal of maximum decadence in food, drink, sex, drugs, the environmentally destructive vicissitudes of fashion is not what makes us happy. Could it be that we feel best doing the best we can and seeking meaning with our fellow human beings in a society that wants us well? Big changes begin in the few deviants. Do you also start for a healthy life in a healthy society. Want to know how we get afford a welfare society?
Wilkinson & Pickett's conclusions have been dramatically confirmed by Peter Turchin: End times, https://peterturchin.com/books/end-times/. Turchin believes he has found a common factor in all social collapses throughout history, namely increased inequality and the refusal of the upper class to contribute to the payment of common affairs.
So if we don't fit in there, the whole society risks collapsing, which would probably have fatal consequences for many of us.
That's what I write about globalization, that when the West wanted to deceive the Western workers about the value of what the workers produced, they undermined the entire foundation the West stood on
https://www.redjustice.net/finanskapitalism-och-feodalvalde-i-vast-mot-industrikapitalism-i-ost/
https://www.oskarbrandt.com/2022/07/27/ojamlik-handel-skapar-obalans-2/
What Turchin is writing about is how it all ends with a war of all against all *within* a Western country, and possibly collapse, in this case in the United States. Not just general decline.
Regarding the decline, there is some good food to pick up from https://mahbubani.net/, in the form of both small newspaper articles and books. I have also written a little myself, e.g. on https://gemensam.wordpress.com/2023/02/08/den-allsidiga-krisen-kraver-en-ny-sorts-program/ with links.
I read your article about the all-round crisis. It was brilliant. When we have re-established a green people's home, it is important to have a power-independent grassroots movement that reins in the parties in power only. In the 1970s, Timbro's now fifty-year counter-revolution in Sweden began.
The movement must start now if there is to be any chance of even starting to move towards a "green people's home", or even avoid moving away from it. But unfortunately, Sweden is probably the worst backwater in all of Europe where all the little movement kids remain isolated and suffocated. Often by related organizations, not infrequently out of pure jealousy it seems.
I wonder if it is not ultimately due to the state subsidies. Organizations have become so used to having their expenses paid for by government grants that they side with the government if a conflict arises. I'm not judging anyone morally, it's about job security for various office staff. But the organizations should try to get away from this dependency and stand on their own two feet.
Wisely! Difficult to get a strong popular movement without government financial support. Maybe money could be raised for folk-thermae. Thermes were exercise, swim, lunch and philosophy buildings where the Romans spent their days alternating between exercising the body and the soul. What if the people could save up for such? But the key, I think, to reach the people, especially without government money, is to combine utility with pleasure.
In any case, togetherness, see https://gemensam.wordpress.com/2023/09/24/bara-en-minoritet-ar-intresserad-av-pengar/ and http://www.folkrorelser.org/blogg/2021/06/13/vi-behover-fler-gemensamma-riter/.
It feels absurd that you should be forced to argue for something that was self-evident as recently as in my youth in the 70s and 80s.