- It's good that they want to create 16 new university, college and polytechnic places. However, it would have been better to create more graduate jobs in the public sector. If you attend an academic education, you should be able to expect to get a matching, qualified job soon. It is false solidarity to trick people into higher education if it does not lead to qualified jobs. But it is a good way to attract middle class votes.
- Good that they want to raise the level of the country's higher education. Too many university graduates spell e.g. way too bad.
- Bad: "Step towards a three-semester system - the universities must offer more relevant summer courses." S also wants to reduce the social stigma towards post-secondary education, which is very good, but that goal is at odds with studying throughout the year. Students who are not used to studying in particular need recovery from the intensive knowledge acquisition during the education for a few months of the year. Instead, introduce holiday pay for post-secondary students.
- VERY GOOD: "Better connection to working life - steps towards internships being included in all programs as well as student employees"
- VERY GOOD AS MENTIONED ABOVE: "Broadened recruitment - more powerful measures to reduce social skewed recruitment"
- GOOD! You may need to supplement your higher education to be able to apply for new jobs. : "Further education - more professionals must return to university"
Despite the fact that S's university investment is not only good, S, V and MP are significantly better potential government parties than the bourgeois. However, I don't like S's new tendencies towards more authoritarian demands like the ter term idea. Shall be for freedom under response and solidarity not authority.