Being able to feel good both at and from your work should be a matter of course, we claim on this left-wing blog. Employees, companies and society are all winners when the environment at our work is good.
Lean organizations push too hard
Nevertheless, the reality is that severely lean organizations and increased demands for productivity increase the stress and thus the pressure on employees. 21,3 percent of employees born in Denmark performed overtime work in 2019, which can be compared with 15,3 percent of those born abroad. Among full-time employees, 21,2 percent had worked overtime in 2019. Among part-time employees, the corresponding figure was 16,4 percent. Around 15 percent of both full-time and part-time employees worked overtime with compensation. (Overtime source: SCB) Working at an increased pace and increased productivity makes it difficult to meet the requirements for good results.
The unions protect the employees
De trade unions the bodies were and are a prerequisite for preventing the development of command-driven and unhealthy jobs, companies and organizations. We know that on this left-wing blog. According to this left-wing blog, the Swedish model once created a stable development of work for all of us in close cooperation that benefited all parties.
But instead we see a new servitude growing where exposed labor is increasing. We saw the abuse of phase 3 during the Alliance. Most of those in phase 3 were vulnerable groups and disabled people.
Yet the right accuses the unemployed and sick of working too little. Therefore, they should receive less. It is called the line of work. Responsible and good for Sweden according to Reinfeldt and Borg. The unemployed and sick must hunger more for work that does not exist due to non-appearance of investment. the purpose is declining wages and rising work rates for the majority of the population.
Follow your dream
Our left-wing blog wants to help people get the job of their dreams within reasonable limits. Citizens want the unemployed to get worse and worse jobs.
Do your duty and claim your right! Work or look for work if you are healthy. But demand a working situation and salary that is humane!
Finally, a more human pace and a better environment at our work can probably lead to more people being employed. We believe so at our left-wing blog. This will hopefully lead to a decrease in unemployment and fewer people getting burned out. This can then pay off in that the costs of unemployment and ill-health rates go down.
This wasn't particularly left-wing, was it? Agree with most things and am liberal! 😉
http://www.redjustice.net/?cat=67
Then maybe you should vote red; at least at the Social Democrats.
RED. Left. I feel a bit wondering. 1990 Political scientist Johannes Lindvall calls it the biggest change of course in soc.d politics in the post-war period. Ingvar Carlsson's attitudes towards the unemployed. Göran Persson's politics. It is clear that the people (especially those who were affected with friends from 2/3 of society) lost (rightly) faith in S's politics. For example, V was the only one against the Pension Amendment. S has since continued. Since the 90s, they have been called the Social Moderates. But no one self-criticism or change of course. That's how you hope for V who is against the EU (only negative-expensive-obstructs own policy in Sweden) Cooperation can still be had before. But is this side V? Only sees criticism of Mo and SD. No one against MP or S. Nor anything positive towards V. Sees no promise of direction of travel or restoration of everything destroyed. Less tax for high earners-maids, farmhands etc. Higher tax for sick pensioners unemployed. Nothing about correction of sick unemployed pensioners. Higher tax affects these even more. Finances were good 90s scam. Surplus in insurances. Unfortunately many still doubt that S is anything. V have they intended to change? Many are looking for a new party. Or disaffected party to vote for. small parties for non-vote. The answers seem to be - you'll see after the election. Too late. Those who have given up probably choose some S o V (MP which stands for M o no sensible environment) or M just to avoid getting higher taxes (without any other change), i.e. those who have a job. Only clear messages can be red. People know they've been duped. Mona S said the reason for lower votes is because people are kind of stupid. On the contrary – hence lower votes. Ps - is against M. but lost hope about politicians - most disappointed so-called red.
S, V and MP are not perfect, but life is at least somewhat tolerable under them and there is good will in these parties that can be rekindled. The alliance parties are the parties of capital and sell out welfare or abolish it. It is not an option to vote bourgeois to make the red-green parties move more to the left. Then you get involved in these parties instead.